Skip to main content

Rough Hewn: The Silence of the Room

A haunting digital illustration of a vast, gothic library with towering, shadowy bookshelves lining both sides. In the dim foreground, a hooded figure sits on the floor beside a single flickering candle, while faint, ghostly silhouettes haunt the upper galleries. The text at the bottom reads: "Rough Hewn: The Silence of the Room," followed by the quote, "It is a strange thing, to be abandoned by someone who never existed," attributed to Shon Mehta.

It is a strange thing, to be abandoned by someone who never existed.— Shon Mehta 


There are moments after completing a story or novel when I feel an odd sadness—an emptiness I cannot quite explain. I realize that my characters—those strange people I once believed I controlled have quietly departed. As they should; and yet, what is unsettling is that I miss them. I feel abandoned. It is a strange thing, to be abandoned by someone who never existed.


During the act of creation, these characters trouble me greatly. Some exhaust my patience, others hurt my conscience, a few even frighten me with the truths they reveal. But once they fall silent, I miss them as one misses acquaintances who, despite their faults, once filled the rooms of one's life with noise and meaning.


Let me talk about a few I remember the most.


The first is Jaskar Dharman. Writing him felt like remembering something I was not aware I knew; he did not simply arrive—he was there, and I just recognized him. He is a figure shaped by order and structure, someone who refuses to collapse beneath the weight of his own flaws. It is not perfection that commands respect in Jaskar, but the refusal to break.



Ink drawing of a tall black monolith standing among ancient stone ruins.



Then there is Isaku. Characters like Isaku are not understood so much as they are felt. He carries a quiet, almost sacred presence, like the silence inside an ancient, forgotten temple. He feels less like an ordinary individual and more like what conscience might look like if it were forced to take human form. He does not speak much, yet he induces a stillness in others that allows them to hear themselves.



Watercolor of a stone bowl on a table under a sunbeam in a wooden attic.



Then there is the street-smart Lokya. Lokya sees the world not as it pretends to be, but as it really is. Writing him felt like conversing with someone who already knows the ending of the story but refuses to reveal it out of politeness. There is a clarity in him that suggests he does not need the writer at all. Lokya feels like someone who could outlive the page.


A dark cobblestone alleyway at night with a single lamp and a skeleton key in a puddle.



I often recall the aura of Queen Travi, the leader of Rongchas. She carries a gravitas that inspires a quiet, solemn respect. She is guided by principles that make her hold on power reassuring. It is a rare kind of power—one that does not demand obedience, but makes it unnecessary. Her presence stabilizes rather than unsettles.


A watercolor illustration of a grand, empty throne room with dark marble pillars and heavy crimson curtains. A shaft of light illuminates a simple, dark throne in the background. In the foreground, a golden royal seal rests on a fringed velvet cushion next to a small glass bowl of bright blue poppies. Text in the lower-left corner reads: "Queen Travi carries a gravitas that inspires a quiet, solemn respect. She is guided by principles that make her hold on power reassuring." — Shon Mehta, Rough Hewn.


I also miss the monk Trivit from The Timingila, though he remains an enigma. Even after all these years, if someone asks me what kind of person Trivit is, I would say I don’t know. He is someone to be accompanied rather than understood. His calm, attentive eyes appear both knowing and distant; he does not hide, yet he never fully reveals himself.


A minimalist black and white watercolor of a lone rowboat on a misty, calm lake.


I might have missed Tasvak more than any other character, if not for the echo of his words—so often repeated, so widely known. He never truly departs, held in the light of his own renown, a voice that cannot find silence because the world insists on repeating his words.


A glowing book titled "The Timingiia" on a library shelf with papers flying above.


And then there is Prince Abhik, who made writing an emotional burden. I hesitate even to speak his name because of the remorse I feel—the remorse of a creator toward a suffering they themselves have invented. I gave him his weaknesses, I planned his punishment, yet there is something unbearable about creating a character whose pain you understand more clearly than your own. At times, I wonder if I was too harsh, but then I realize that mercy might have destroyed him. A kinder world would have made him an ordinary character, and he was meant for something more.


A rusted padlock and chain on an iron gate with red rose petals scattered on the ground.


Why do we do this? Why create lives only to burden them with meanings and contradictions we ourselves cannot resolve?


Perhaps because it is the only way we are capable of examining what we would otherwise avoid. In doing so, we become responsible for sorrows that never happened, and yet feel entirely real. Then, when the characters leave, the room returns to its silence—but it is not the usual silence.


 It is a silence that remembers them.

———

The Inhabitants of the Silence:


Jaskar Dharman, Tasvak, & Trivit: From The Timingila

Prince Abhik, Queen Travi, Lokya, & Isaku: From Lair of the Monster.




——


Shon Mehta is an author and philosopher known for creating the Jivavarta Universe, a fictional setting used to explore sociopolitical themes, human resilience, and moral philosophy. Her work has transitioned from contemporary fiction to foundational academic material used in several countries. Rough Hewn is her series of reflective essays, where she explores the personal memories and philosophies behind her writing.


Comments

  1. Touché! When I finish my books, I miss my characters terribly.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Every time someone types or speaks the words “Maybe villain in your story,” Tasvak will be reborn. He cannot rest; he will never rest.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In modern ethics, we often grant "moral authority" to those who have suffered. Jivavarta rejects this. If suffering doesn't make you a better person, does it mean that the "oppressor" and the "oppressed" are on the same moral plane? Does this perspective empower the victim to stop being a victim, or does it cruelly strip away the only "moral shield" they have?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jivavarta doesn't suggest that the oppressor is innocent; it suggests that the victim is not automatically holy.

      Delete
  4. Tasvak begins as a discarded prince, a victim of structural oppression, but refuses to let exile define him. Where others might wield suffering as a “moral shield,” he rejects the comfort of self-righteous stagnation and embraces the Jivavarta Pivot: being a victim is not considered virtue, and righteousness alone does not grant strength. By stripping away excuses, he accepts radical responsibility, refusing to let past wounds dictate present weakness. This transformation marks him as an anti-hero—willing to be the villain in another’s tale if it ensures survival in his own. Tasvak shoulders the burden of the crown, trading pity for power, and shifts his question from “Why did they do this to me?” to “What must I do so they can never do it again?”

    ReplyDelete
  5. Omg! Speak up, What did you do to Prince Abhik? That you can’t speak about him.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment